Zelensky stated in his nightly video address: "We have conveyed our proposals to the American side" . The proposals were handed to the U.S. negotiating team as part of a push to restart the peace process. Zelensky also warned that Russia may use its September 2026 parliamentary election as a pretext to declare a new wave of mobilization . While the full details remain undisclosed, Ukraine has consistently maintained its position against any territorial concessions, with Zelensky stating he lacks the authority under Ukrainian and international law to cede land . Reports from mid-August suggest the proposed framework would halt fighting along the existing front line without Ukraine formally recognizing Russian sovereignty over occupied territories .
Moscow's reaction has been dismissive and largely unchanged from its hardline stance:
The Institute for the Study of War assessed on August 14 that "Kremlin officials continue reiterating Russia's unwillingness to engage in any meaningful peace negotiations that fail to fulfill Russia's demands for Ukraine's complete capitulation" .
Zelensky wants the United States to play a central, active role as both mediator and guarantor. Specifically, he has called on Washington to:
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha confirmed in early August that the peace negotiation process involving the U.S. is currently "on hold" and that Kyiv is awaiting the U.S. delegation's arrival .
The following table summarizes the core disagreements that have prevented any substantive progress:
| Issue | Ukraine's Position | Russia's Position |
|---|---|---|
| Territory | No land concessions; full restoration of 1991 borders | Demands full cession of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Crimea; now refuses to return any occupied land |
| NATO membership | Seeks security guarantees, including eventual NATO or equivalent alliance | Demands Ukraine be permanently neutral and never join NATO |
| Ceasefire terms | Supports mutual aerial/Black Sea ceasefires as confidence-building measures | Rejects partial truces; demands Ukraine's full capitulation first |
| Format of talks | Bilateral U.S.-mediated or multilateral (including European partners) | Wants to consider proposals from "only one side" (Moscow's terms), not Ukraine's |
| Mobilization concerns | Fears Russia will use September 2026 elections to draft more troops | No sign of de-escalation; Kremlin says it will keep fighting while waiting for U.S. proposals |
With both sides entrenched in their positions and Moscow showing no willingness to compromise, the prospects for a diplomatic breakthrough in the near term remain bleak. The coming arrival of U.S. envoys in Ukraine and Russia will test whether Washington can shift the dynamic.
Zelensky stated in his nightly video address: "We have conveyed our proposals to the American side" . The proposals were handed to the U.S. negotiating team as part of a push to restart the peace process. Zelensky also warned that Russia may use its September 2026 parliamentary election as a pretext to declare a new wave of mobilization . While the full details remain undisclosed, Ukraine has consistently maintained its position against any territorial concessions, with Zelensky stating he lacks the authority under Ukrainian and international law to cede land . Reports from mid-August suggest the proposed framework would halt fighting along the existing front line without Ukraine formally recognizing Russian sovereignty over occupied territories .
Moscow's reaction has been dismissive and largely unchanged from its hardline stance:
The Institute for the Study of War assessed on August 14 that "Kremlin officials continue reiterating Russia's unwillingness to engage in any meaningful peace negotiations that fail to fulfill Russia's demands for Ukraine's complete capitulation" .
Zelensky wants the United States to play a central, active role as both mediator and guarantor. Specifically, he has called on Washington to:
Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha confirmed in early August that the peace negotiation process involving the U.S. is currently "on hold" and that Kyiv is awaiting the U.S. delegation's arrival .
The following table summarizes the core disagreements that have prevented any substantive progress:
| Issue | Ukraine's Position | Russia's Position |
|---|---|---|
| Territory | No land concessions; full restoration of 1991 borders | Demands full cession of Donetsk, Luhansk, Zaporizhzhia, Kherson, and Crimea; now refuses to return any occupied land |
| NATO membership | Seeks security guarantees, including eventual NATO or equivalent alliance | Demands Ukraine be permanently neutral and never join NATO |
| Ceasefire terms | Supports mutual aerial/Black Sea ceasefires as confidence-building measures | Rejects partial truces; demands Ukraine's full capitulation first |
| Format of talks | Bilateral U.S.-mediated or multilateral (including European partners) | Wants to consider proposals from "only one side" (Moscow's terms), not Ukraine's |
| Mobilization concerns | Fears Russia will use September 2026 elections to draft more troops | No sign of de-escalation; Kremlin says it will keep fighting while waiting for U.S. proposals |
With both sides entrenched in their positions and Moscow showing no willingness to compromise, the prospects for a diplomatic breakthrough in the near term remain bleak. The coming arrival of U.S. envoys in Ukraine and Russia will test whether Washington can shift the dynamic.