Revenue growth was undeniably strong. Adidas posted a 14% increase in currency-neutral revenue, reaching a record €6.74 billion ($7.7 billion) for the second quarter . Demand for running and football gear, retro Originals apparel, and World Cup–themed products drove the top line.
The problem was on the bottom line. Operating profit came in at €574 million ($658 million), up just 5% year-on-year and roughly 8% below the analyst consensus of about €616 million . The critical gap between strong revenue growth and weak profit growth is what triggered the sell-off .
The primary culprit behind the margin compression was an extraordinary ramp-up in marketing spending. Adidas spent an additional €212 million ($243 million) on marketing in Q2, a 30% increase year-on-year, largely tied to World Cup campaigns and activations . The company's total marketing bill for the quarter reached roughly €924 million ($1.05 billion) .
That spending did drive sales — Adidas sold four times as many World Cup jerseys as it had originally forecast — but it absorbed most of the revenue upside, leaving little room for profit growth .
Even though Adidas raised its full-year sales forecast to expect 9–10% currency-neutral revenue growth (up from high single digits), it left its full-year operating profit target unchanged at around €2.3 billion .
Investors who were hoping for a profit upgrade read the unchanged guidance as an implicit signal that the strong top line would not translate into improving profitability . As one analyst described it: "In absolute terms Q2 was a good quarter but against a high bar of expectations it underwhelmed" .
Adding to the unease, long-serving CFO Harm Ohlmeyer announced he would not renew his contract after nearly 30 years with the company . While Adidas named a successor, the transition added a layer of leadership uncertainty at a critical moment . Analysts at the time noted the adverse stock reaction was "a cocktail of Harm Ohlmeyer not extending his contract" combined with the profit miss .
The 17.9% single-day drop sent Adidas shares below €150 for the first time in months, leaving the stock down roughly 10% for the year . The episode illustrates a classic investor paradox: strong sales do not matter if the cost of generating them erodes profitability faster than expected.
For Adidas, the World Cup was a clear commercial success in terms of brand visibility and unit sales. But for investors, the price of that success — compressed margins and a profit guidance that refuses to budge — was simply too high.