The ECB paused primarily to buy time to assess the fallout from renewed Middle East conflict and the associated energy disruption . This pause came just six weeks after the bank raised rates by 25 basis points in June — its first increase since June 2025. The Governing Council wanted to gauge how the oil-price shock was transmitting through the eurozone economy before committing to another move .
A June 11 Reuters report had already flagged that officials were inclined to pause if energy prices remained stable . When oil subsequently spiked to $100/barrel, that caution was reinforced . The ECB described the pause as a "hawkish hold" — not a signal that the tightening cycle is over, but a tactical breather to gather more data.
Despite the pause, the ECB held the door wide open to a September rate increase . The official statement and accompanying communications were deliberately hawkish, reiterating that inflation remains the dominant risk and that further tightening may be needed . Reuters reported that the central bank "will hold the door wide open to another rate hike in September" .
This was widely interpreted as a strong signal that a move at the September 10 meeting is the base case, barring a material deterioration in economic conditions or a rapid easing of energy prices.
Swap markets assign roughly a 60%–62% probability of a 25 bp hike at the September 10, 2026 meeting . A separate measure from ecb-watch.eu put the odds at 61.7% for a move to 2.50% . By the October 29 meeting, markets price a roughly 63%–74% chance that rates reach 2.50% or higher .
These probabilities are dynamic and shift with each new data point on inflation, oil prices, and geopolitical developments.
The dominant driver is the Middle East conflict (Iran/US tensions) and its impact on energy prices . Oil hit $100/barrel on July 23, a fresh spike that reignites upward pressure on inflation . The ECB's baseline assumes that if oil prices decline in line with futures markets, inflation can return to target — but the outlook is highly uncertain .
Earlier peace efforts in mid-2026 briefly lowered oil prices and reduced the urgency to hike , but the resurgence of fighting reversed that dynamic. The ECB's April account noted that investors saw inflation as the dominant risk and were pricing 73 bp of cumulative hikes for 2026 .
The ECB's June 2026 Eurosystem staff projections show the following path for headline inflation:
Both Governing Council members shifted their tone notably in late June 2026, but their emphasis differs:
Pierre Wunsch (Belgium, generally considered a hawk): On June 30, Wunsch told Bloomberg TV that "the case for another rate hike isn't as strong now" after the US-Iran deal "more or less" removed the origin of the energy shock . However, in a Reuters interview on June 19, he warned that if services inflation remained elevated, "it might be prudent to increase rates by another 25 basis points" . By late June he was saying the council "might need another hike, but not necessarily in July" .
Martins Kazaks (Latvia, generally considered a centrist/dove): On June 30, Kazaks said the ECB is "in no rush to raise interest rates again" after peace efforts lowered oil and reduced inflation risks, and that progress toward ending hostilities had "weakened the overall case for more hikes" . Earlier, in April, he had warned against assuming the ECB's next move would be a hike at all, saying that while he saw no reason to challenge market expectations for two increases, that was "just one of several scenarios" .
Key difference: Wunsch leans toward still needing a hike (just not in July), citing lagging services inflation as a risk . Kazaks is more dovish, emphasizing that the probability of severe negative scenarios has "fallen massively" and there is "no need for multiple ECB hikes in a rushed way" . A Bloomberg summary characterizes the broader divide as hawks arguing that inflationary pressures from the US-Iran conflict are still propagating via wages and services, while doves contend oil has retreated and second-round effects are unlikely .