The earlier diplomatic framework — the Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), brokered by Pakistan and Qatar — had collapsed by early July . With no deal in place and the Strait of Hormuz paralyzed, mediators scrambled for a new off-ramp.
On July 21–22, 2026, Pakistan and Qatar jointly proposed a 10-day halt in hostilities between the U.S. and Iran, aiming to revive the stalled MoU . The proposal called for both sides to return to pre-July 9 positions and lift navigation restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz . Iran's interior minister reportedly signaled openness . The Trump administration was described as "considering" the proposal as of July 22 . U.S. officials also reportedly urged Israel not to take actions that could undermine the mediation . In addition to Pakistan and Qatar, Egypt was also listed among the mediators who submitted the proposal .
President Trump faced a decisive fork. According to Axios (July 21), U.S. and Israeli officials saw only two viable endgames: pursue the new 10-day ceasefire to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, or launch a massive joint military campaign with Israel to force Tehran's capitulation .
Publicly, Trump maintained a hard line. On July 20, he wrote on Truth Social that Iran would "pay many times over" for any American troops killed . Yet the U.S. also continued to signal openness to talks. On July 11, Trump said the U.S. and Iran had agreed to continue indirect dialogue even after the earlier ceasefire collapsed .
Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave the clearest public signal of continued U.S. openness to negotiation, while also voicing skepticism:
The mediation was in a pending, unresolved phase:
Bottom line: As of July 22, 2026, the Trump administration was publicly weighing the Pakistan-Qatar 10-day ceasefire proposal, with Trump's posture oscillating between threats of escalation and openness to talks, while Rubio explicitly stated the U.S. remained willing to negotiate but accused Iran of not being serious. No deal had been reached, and hostilities were ongoing.