The Four Addictive Features Targeted

The Commission identified four interlocking design elements as the core of the violation:

• Infinite scroll (endless scrolling feeds) – automatically loading new content so users have no natural stopping point
• Autoplay video – videos that play by default, keeping users continuously engaged
• Push notifications – targeted alerts designed to repeatedly draw users back into the platforms
• Highly personalized recommendation algorithms – AI-powered recommender systems that curate hyper-tailored feeds to maximize time spent

The Commission's position is that Meta knowingly designed these features to maximize user attention without conducting a proper DSA-mandated risk assessment of their addictive potential .

Potential Fine: Up to 6% of Global Annual Revenue

Under the DSA, the Commission can impose fines of up to 6% of a company's total worldwide annual turnover for non-compliance . Multiple sources peg Meta's exposure at roughly $12 billion, based on Meta's 2025 reported global revenue of ~$200 billion . This fine would apply only if the preliminary findings are confirmed after Meta exercises its rights of defense in the formal proceeding .

What the Commission Demands: Default-Setting Changes and Screen-Time Breaks

The Commission ordered Meta to change default settings to make the platforms less addictive and to introduce effective screen-time breaks and other mitigation measures . Specifically:

• Meta must disable "key addictive features" for users by default, including infinite scroll and autoplay, or offer them only through an explicit opt-in
• It must implement screen-time dashboards and break reminders that genuinely interrupt sustained use — not easily dismissible pop-ups
• The burden of proving the design changes are effective rests with Meta

Meta has been given a formal period to respond and propose remedies before the Commission issues a final, binding decision .

Meta's Simultaneous Legal Challenge in Ireland's High Court

Separately, on 13 July 2026, Meta launched a High Court challenge in Ireland against Coimisiún na Meán (the Irish media regulator) . The challenge seeks to halt two investigations that Coimisiún na Meán opened in May 2026 against Instagram and Facebook under:

• Article 25 of the DSA – which prohibits "dark patterns" (deceptive or manipulative interface design)
• Article 27 of the DSA – which governs the transparency and user control of recommender systems

These Irish probes examine whether Meta's interface design makes it difficult for users to control what content they see and whether algorithmic feeds manipulate user behavior without adequate transparency . Meta is seeking a court order quashing the regulator's decision to open these investigations, arguing procedural and jurisdictional grounds . This Irish action is a separate legal track from the Commission's Article 33 proceeding against VLOPs (Very Large Online Platforms) .

Context: Meta's Second DSA Violation Finding in 2026

The July 2026 addictive-design finding is Meta's second preliminary DSA violation in six months.

On 29 April 2026, the Commission preliminarily found Meta in breach of the DSA for failing to prevent children under 13 from using Instagram and Facebook, despite the platforms' own age restrictions . That April case alleged Meta had not taken effective enough measures to detect and block underage users, exposing minors to content and data-collection risks the DSA is designed to guard against . That case also carried a potential fine of up to 6% of global annual revenue .

Meta has also faced earlier DSA-related actions: in October 2025, the Commission preliminarily found Meta in breach over inadequate researcher data access and an ineffective illegal-content complaint system .

The Four Addictive Features Targeted

The Commission identified four interlocking design elements as the core of the violation:

• Infinite scroll (endless scrolling feeds) – automatically loading new content so users have no natural stopping point
• Autoplay video – videos that play by default, keeping users continuously engaged
• Push notifications – targeted alerts designed to repeatedly draw users back into the platforms
• Highly personalized recommendation algorithms – AI-powered recommender systems that curate hyper-tailored feeds to maximize time spent

The Commission's position is that Meta knowingly designed these features to maximize user attention without conducting a proper DSA-mandated risk assessment of their addictive potential .

Potential Fine: Up to 6% of Global Annual Revenue

Under the DSA, the Commission can impose fines of up to 6% of a company's total worldwide annual turnover for non-compliance . Multiple sources peg Meta's exposure at roughly $12 billion, based on Meta's 2025 reported global revenue of ~$200 billion . This fine would apply only if the preliminary findings are confirmed after Meta exercises its rights of defense in the formal proceeding .

What the Commission Demands: Default-Setting Changes and Screen-Time Breaks

The Commission ordered Meta to change default settings to make the platforms less addictive and to introduce effective screen-time breaks and other mitigation measures . Specifically:

• Meta must disable "key addictive features" for users by default, including infinite scroll and autoplay, or offer them only through an explicit opt-in
• It must implement screen-time dashboards and break reminders that genuinely interrupt sustained use — not easily dismissible pop-ups
• The burden of proving the design changes are effective rests with Meta

Meta has been given a formal period to respond and propose remedies before the Commission issues a final, binding decision .

Meta's Simultaneous Legal Challenge in Ireland's High Court

Separately, on 13 July 2026, Meta launched a High Court challenge in Ireland against Coimisiún na Meán (the Irish media regulator) . The challenge seeks to halt two investigations that Coimisiún na Meán opened in May 2026 against Instagram and Facebook under:

• Article 25 of the DSA – which prohibits "dark patterns" (deceptive or manipulative interface design)
• Article 27 of the DSA – which governs the transparency and user control of recommender systems

These Irish probes examine whether Meta's interface design makes it difficult for users to control what content they see and whether algorithmic feeds manipulate user behavior without adequate transparency . Meta is seeking a court order quashing the regulator's decision to open these investigations, arguing procedural and jurisdictional grounds . This Irish action is a separate legal track from the Commission's Article 33 proceeding against VLOPs (Very Large Online Platforms) .

Context: Meta's Second DSA Violation Finding in 2026

The July 2026 addictive-design finding is Meta's second preliminary DSA violation in six months.

On 29 April 2026, the Commission preliminarily found Meta in breach of the DSA for failing to prevent children under 13 from using Instagram and Facebook, despite the platforms' own age restrictions . That April case alleged Meta had not taken effective enough measures to detect and block underage users, exposing minors to content and data-collection risks the DSA is designed to guard against . That case also carried a potential fine of up to 6% of global annual revenue .

Meta has also faced earlier DSA-related actions: in October 2025, the Commission preliminarily found Meta in breach over inadequate researcher data access and an ineffective illegal-content complaint system .