Who filed it: Stichting Massaschade & Consument (SMC), a Dutch consumer nonprofit, filed the suit on behalf of approximately 1.7 million Dutch PlayStation users .
The core argument: Sony's 30% commission on every PlayStation Store sale — a "Sony tax" that physical retail games are not subject to — will inevitably inflate game prices once the physical-disc alternative is eliminated . The suit seeks €400 million (approx. $457 million) in damages
. SMC argues the disc-free decision "essentially destroys Sony's own defense" because it eliminates the only pricing competition (retail discs) that constrained the 30% commission
.
Pricing evidence cited in the case: Dutch consumers allegedly pay 47% more for digital PlayStation games than for physical copies — a structural gap created by the 30% platform commission versus retailer royalties on discs . Reports indicate physical PS5 games are routinely tens of euros cheaper than their digital equivalents for this reason
.
SMC chair Lucia Melcherts summed up the group's position: "The end of physical discs removes the last place where a PlayStation game could still be bought and sold at a competitive price. No discs means no second-hand market" .
As of July 13, 2026, two Mexican lawmakers announced they would file a formal antitrust complaint with Mexico's National Antitrust Commission, though it had not yet been formally submitted .
Who: Federal Representative Iraís Reyes and Senator Luis Donaldo Colosio, both members of Mexico's Citizens' Movement party .
Their argument: Sony's elimination of physical discs would concentrate the entire game market in Sony's closed PlayStation Store, creating a monopoly that harms consumers, independent retailers, and game developers . Reyes called Sony's conduct monopolistic and said the move "violates the law"
. Senator Colosio noted the move would harm local retailers and end the second-hand market
.
These lawsuits predate the July 2026 disc announcement but remain active and gained fresh relevance as the disc phaseout removes the last competitive pricing benchmark:
Multiple sources note game retailers and trade bodies condemned the decision, arguing it eliminates retail competition and destroys the used-game market . Reuters and other outlets report retailers fear significant revenue loss as physical game sales vanish
. The petition itself was started by Jade Pearce, the CEO of an independent Canadian games retailer
.
As of mid-July 2026, Sony has not issued any public statement responding to the Dutch class action, the Mexican antitrust complaint, the pre-existing UK/US lawsuits, or the petition . The company's only public-facing communication remains the original July 1 PlayStation Blog post announcing the phaseout, which offered no detailed rationale beyond citing "consumer preferences"
.
If Sony proceeds with its disc phaseout as planned, new PlayStation games released after January 2028 will only be available as digital downloads or as a box containing only a download code — no disc inside . This eliminates the ability to buy, sell, trade, lend, or resell physical game discs, and removes the competitive pricing pressure that physical retail provides. The legal and regulatory challenges noted above seek to either reverse the decision or compensate consumers for the higher prices they argue will result.