Iranian Lawmaker Ebrahim Rezaei Warns of NPT Withdrawal as US-Iran Military Confrontation Escalates

In the summer of 2026, a rapidly escalating military confrontation between the United States and Iran brought the Middle East to the brink of a wider war, directly linked to a significant threat from Tehran: withdrawal from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). At the center of this legislative push was Ebrahim Rezaei, the spokesperson for the National Security and Foreign Policy Committee of the Iranian Parliament (Majlis). Here is a fact-checked account of his warning, how it connects to Iran's potential nuclear doctrine shift, and the timeline of the escalating conflict in late June and early July 2026.

Ebrahim Rezaei's NPT Withdrawal Warning

Ebrahim Rezaei has been a key voice advocating for Iran to leave the NPT, escalating his rhetoric since mid-2025. His most direct threat came in late March 2026, following U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities. The core of his argument is that the treaty has failed its fundamental purpose.

• A 'Meaningless' Treaty: In a post on social media platform X in late March 2026, Rezaei described Iran's continued membership in the NPT as "meaningless," arguing the treaty "has brought us no benefits" and "failed to protect Iran's nuclear facilities from attacks by nuclear powers" (the U.S. and Israel) . He stated, "Now is the time to withdraw from the NPT" .
• Fast-Tracked Legislation: Rezaei's statements supported a fast-tracked bill in parliament that proposes three measures: formal withdrawal from the NPT, a repeal of laws governing Iran's commitments under the nuclear deal, and a shift in nuclear policy . The bill, introduced by lawmaker Malek Shariati, is titled “Support for the Nuclear Rights of the Iranian Nation” .
• Nuclear Doctrine Shift: Reuters reported on March 26, 2026, that Iranian hardliners had intensified calls to revise Iran's nuclear doctrine—which would mean pursuing a nuclear weapon—to restore deterrence . Rezaei's committee is central to advancing this legislative push. Despite these calls, Iranian officials continued to state that Tehran has not sought and will not seek nuclear weapons .
• Confirmed Review: By June 2026, at least four official Iranian statements confirmed that Tehran was actively considering NPT withdrawal . The Arms Control Association confirmed the withdrawal legislation was introduced in Iran's parliament .

Escalating Military Conflict: A Timeline

The political threat of NPT withdrawal did not exist in a vacuum. It was both a cause and an effect of a dramatic military escalation between the U.S. and Iran. The following timeline is verified by sources including NPR, Reuters, The New York Times, and U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM).

Late June 2026: Cycle of Strikes Begins

• U.S. and Iran trade strikes: CENTCOM forces struck Iranian military surveillance, communication, and air defense sites. In retaliation, Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) claimed it destroyed eight U.S. military assets in strikes on U.S. sites in Kuwait and Bahrain .
• June 27, 2026: The U.S. struck Iran in response to a drone attack on an oil tanker in the Strait of Hormuz. Iran's IRGC said it targeted 'several locations of the U.S. terrorist army in the region' .

Early July 2026: Major Escalation and Ceasefire Collapse

• July 7, 2026: The U.S. military launched 'powerful strikes' on Iran, accusing Tehran of attacking three commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz . CENTCOM stated it hit over 80 targets with precision munitions . The U.S. also revoked Iran's ability to openly sell crude oil on the world market .
• July 8, 2026: President Donald Trump declared a three-week cease-fire deal 'finished,' saying Iran would 'pay the price' for stalled negotiations . The U.S. military launched a second day of strikes on Iran .
• July 8–9, 2026: In retaliation, Iran's IRGC Navy and Aerospace Force conducted joint strikes against U.S. military bases in Bahrain and Kuwait. The IRGC claimed to have struck 85 US military sites . The strikes targeted key infrastructure, including the district of Juffair in Manama, which hosts the U.S. Navy's 5th Fleet .
• Diplomatic Collapse: The escalation derailed the June 18 memorandum of understanding, with Iran threatening a 'complete halt' to negotiations .

How the Threats Connect

Rezaei’s NPT withdrawal warnings provide the political and legal framework for Iran's potential nuclear doctrine shift. Each U.S. and Israeli strike wave provides hardliners with evidence that the NPT offers no security guarantee. The elements are interlocking:

1. Political/Legal Front: The fast-tracked bill in parliament and Rezaei’s statements aim to remove the legal barriers to developing nuclear weapons by exiting the NPT .
2. Military Front: The IRGC’s strikes on U.S. bases in the Gulf and attacks on shipping in the Strait of Hormuz serve as immediate retaliation and a signal of the costs of further strikes on Iranian soil.
3. Strategic Message: Iran is signaling that if its territory and nuclear facilities are hit, it will not only escalate militarily in the region but also fundamentally alter its non-proliferation commitments, potentially pursuing nuclear weapons for the first time.

This convergence of legislative action and military escalation in mid-2026 created a scenario where the long-standing threat of an Iranian nuclear weapon moved closer to reality, with the collapse of the ceasefire and the surge in oil prices through the Strait of Hormuz underscoring the global stakes.