Services trade also hit €865 billion, but here the EU ran a deficit with the United States .
But the IW study stresses that these aggregate numbers obscure deep sectoral fractures:
The year saw a rapid series of tariff actions before a fragile deal was reached mid-year:
| Date | Action |
|---|---|
| March 12, 2025 | US imposed 25% tariff on steel and aluminum (Section 232) |
| April 3, 2025 | US imposed 25% tariff on imported automobiles (Section 232) |
| April 5, 2025 | US imposed 10% baseline tariff; additional "reciprocal" tariffs followed |
| July 27–28, 2025 | EU and US reached a preliminary trade deal in Turnberry, Scotland: a single all-inclusive 15% tariff ceiling on most EU goods, including autos, auto parts, pharmaceuticals, and semiconductors . Steel, aluminum, and copper tariffs (50%) remained unchanged . |
| August 1, 2025 | 15% tariff on EU autos and auto parts formally took effect, retroactively applied from August 1 . |
The July deal averted a broader trade war. In return, the EU agreed to eliminate duties on imports of US industrial goods . However, the agreement was not legally binding, a fact that would prove critical .
The 15% tariff ceiling did not hold. By early 2026, the trade war reignited:
Economists caution that part of this drop reflects front-loading of exports in 2025 and euro appreciation, not solely the tariff hikes . But the volatility itself has created deep uncertainty for transatlantic supply chains.
The IW study’s bottom line is clear: record headline trade figures mask serious underlying damage, particularly to the German automotive industry . The tariff rollercoaster — from the initial 25% auto tariff in April 2025, to the 15% July deal, to the 2026 reversals — has made long-term planning nearly impossible for manufacturers on both sides of the Atlantic.
A separate IW study from September 2025 had already warned that US import dependence on the EU was rising, outpacing China over the last 15 years . That interdependence, the IW argues, makes the current tariff volatility particularly damaging: both sides are too intertwined to benefit from a prolonged trade war, yet the tariff shocks keep multiplying.