Key Findings: Why Stablecoins Fall Short

1. Stablecoins fail foundational properties of money.
The BIS argues that current stablecoin designs lack three essential attributes that underpin trust in money: singleness (the ability to exchange at par with other forms of the same currency), elasticity of supply (the ability to expand and contract with demand), and interoperability across different ledgers . Stablecoins operating on public permissionless blockchains also face challenges related to financial integrity and scalability .

2. Widespread adoption would create macroeconomic and financial stability risks.
The BIS warns that broader use of stablecoins could drain bank deposit funding and disrupt credit provision, with direct implications for financial stability . As stablecoins' linkages with the traditional financial system grow, the risks of stress transmission across markets increase, raising policy challenges for authorities . Separately, BIS research finds that inflows into stablecoins impact short-term Treasury yields, showing the market is already large enough to affect safe asset prices .

3. 'Stablecoin dollarization' threatens emerging and developing economies (EMDEs).
The BIS has warned that the broader use of foreign-currency-denominated stablecoins — approximately 98% of which are pegged to the U.S. dollar — could erode monetary sovereignty in some jurisdictions . The IMF has similarly noted that stablecoin demand is often elevated in countries with weak macroeconomic fundamentals and policy frameworks, raising currency-substitution concerns . BIS research shows these flows can also spill over into traditional FX markets, depreciating local currencies and raising the cost of accessing dollars .

4. Growing stablecoin-traditional finance links create a regulatory blind spot.
The BIS notes that stablecoins' increasing connections to the traditional financial system raise policy challenges across financial integrity, consumer protection, and financial stability, and that the principle of "same risks, same regulation" faces limitations in this context, requiring tailored approaches .

Policy Recommendations: Regulation Now, Tokenization Next

Near-term: Regulate and fix current stablecoin design.
The BIS calls for coordinated global action on stablecoin regulation, describing global cooperation as critically important to avoid regulatory fragmentation and address risks effectively . In an April 2026 speech, BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos identified five specific risk categories tied to stablecoin growth: effects on credit supply, financial stability, monetary policy, fiscal policy, and regulatory circumvention . In its 2026 report chapter, the BIS specifically endorses tackling weaknesses in current stablecoin arrangements to mitigate risks as a first policy pillar .

Long-term: Bring tokenization into the two-tier banking system via a unified ledger.
Rather than relying on parallel systems built on public blockchains, the BIS argues that tokenization should be developed in ways that preserve the role of central bank money as the anchor of the monetary system . The BIS's tokenization work highlights programmable platforms, atomic settlement, and tokenized representations of money and other assets as ways to improve financial-market infrastructure .

• The unified ledger concept envisions a programmable platform that hosts tokenized money and other assets, with central bank money helping preserve trust and the singleness of money .
• Participation would require safeguards such as strong governance, transparency, sound backing arrangements, and compliance with financial-integrity requirements .
• Project Agorá, a public-private initiative involving central banks and regulated financial institutions, builds on the unified ledger concept by combining tokenized commercial bank money with tokenized central bank money to improve wholesale cross-border payments .

The unifying principle: technology should serve, not undermine, the core public-good functions of money . The BIS's answer is not simply to reject innovation, but to embed tokenization within the trusted, regulated two-tier monetary system .

Key Findings: Why Stablecoins Fall Short

1. Stablecoins fail foundational properties of money.
The BIS argues that current stablecoin designs lack three essential attributes that underpin trust in money: singleness (the ability to exchange at par with other forms of the same currency), elasticity of supply (the ability to expand and contract with demand), and interoperability across different ledgers . Stablecoins operating on public permissionless blockchains also face challenges related to financial integrity and scalability .

2. Widespread adoption would create macroeconomic and financial stability risks.
The BIS warns that broader use of stablecoins could drain bank deposit funding and disrupt credit provision, with direct implications for financial stability . As stablecoins' linkages with the traditional financial system grow, the risks of stress transmission across markets increase, raising policy challenges for authorities . Separately, BIS research finds that inflows into stablecoins impact short-term Treasury yields, showing the market is already large enough to affect safe asset prices .

3. 'Stablecoin dollarization' threatens emerging and developing economies (EMDEs).
The BIS has warned that the broader use of foreign-currency-denominated stablecoins — approximately 98% of which are pegged to the U.S. dollar — could erode monetary sovereignty in some jurisdictions . The IMF has similarly noted that stablecoin demand is often elevated in countries with weak macroeconomic fundamentals and policy frameworks, raising currency-substitution concerns . BIS research shows these flows can also spill over into traditional FX markets, depreciating local currencies and raising the cost of accessing dollars .

4. Growing stablecoin-traditional finance links create a regulatory blind spot.
The BIS notes that stablecoins' increasing connections to the traditional financial system raise policy challenges across financial integrity, consumer protection, and financial stability, and that the principle of "same risks, same regulation" faces limitations in this context, requiring tailored approaches .

Policy Recommendations: Regulation Now, Tokenization Next

Near-term: Regulate and fix current stablecoin design.
The BIS calls for coordinated global action on stablecoin regulation, describing global cooperation as critically important to avoid regulatory fragmentation and address risks effectively . In an April 2026 speech, BIS General Manager Pablo Hernández de Cos identified five specific risk categories tied to stablecoin growth: effects on credit supply, financial stability, monetary policy, fiscal policy, and regulatory circumvention . In its 2026 report chapter, the BIS specifically endorses tackling weaknesses in current stablecoin arrangements to mitigate risks as a first policy pillar .

Long-term: Bring tokenization into the two-tier banking system via a unified ledger.
Rather than relying on parallel systems built on public blockchains, the BIS argues that tokenization should be developed in ways that preserve the role of central bank money as the anchor of the monetary system . The BIS's tokenization work highlights programmable platforms, atomic settlement, and tokenized representations of money and other assets as ways to improve financial-market infrastructure .

• The unified ledger concept envisions a programmable platform that hosts tokenized money and other assets, with central bank money helping preserve trust and the singleness of money .
• Participation would require safeguards such as strong governance, transparency, sound backing arrangements, and compliance with financial-integrity requirements .
• Project Agorá, a public-private initiative involving central banks and regulated financial institutions, builds on the unified ledger concept by combining tokenized commercial bank money with tokenized central bank money to improve wholesale cross-border payments .

The unifying principle: technology should serve, not undermine, the core public-good functions of money . The BIS's answer is not simply to reject innovation, but to embed tokenization within the trusted, regulated two-tier monetary system .