The most immediate catalyst for gold’s decline came from the Middle East, where renewed military conflict between the United States and Iran sent crude prices surging and raised inflation expectations — a double-edged sword for gold.
Crude oil prices spiked in early June after Iran announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz following fresh US strikes, raising fears of major supply disruptions . The International Center for Industrial Studies (ICIS) reported that Brent crude jumped by more than $2 per barrel on June 11, reaching $95.16, while US WTI spiked 2.61%
. Earlier, on June 1, oil prices surged more than 5% after US and Iran exchanged strikes, with Brent rising 4.61% to $95.32 per barrel
. The escalation continued throughout June, with tit-for-tat strikes keeping the region on edge.
Higher oil prices feed directly into inflation concerns, which in turn reinforce the case for tighter monetary policy. The CME FedWatch context for the June 2026 FOMC meeting explicitly cited "persistent inflation pressures, including a recent spike tied to geopolitical tensions" as a reason the Fed was expected to hold rates steady .
Oil prices later fell sharply after a tentative US-Iran deal was announced on June 15. The BBC reported that Brent crude dropped over 5% to $82.84 per barrel after President Donald Trump indicated the agreement would facilitate reopening the Strait of Hormuz . However, renewed strikes in late June pushed oil prices back up, with Brent rising 0.9% on June 29 as fresh doubts emerged about a return to normal shipping through the Strait
.
The June 2026 FOMC meeting delivered a near-certain hold at the 3.50%–3.75% federal funds target range, as expected by markets . But the real story was the dramatic repricing of rate-hike probabilities for the rest of the year.
On June 17, the Wall Street Journal reported that CME Group data showed interest-rate futures pricing a 37% likelihood of the Federal Reserve implementing two rate hikes this year — up sharply from just 17% the previous day . This rapid shift reflected a market environment in which persistent inflation, a resilient labor market, and a hawkish tone from new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh had traders bracing for tighter policy.
Prediction markets tracked a similar move. Polymarket data showed that by late June, markets embedded roughly a two-thirds probability of at least one hike by December, with the median end-2026 funds rate rising to 3.8% from 3.4% . CME FedWatch data as of June 27 showed a 69% probability the Fed would hold, with a 31% chance of a hike to 3.75%–4.00%
.
The most striking institutional call came on June 22, when Bank of America reversed its policy outlook entirely. The bank now expects the Federal Reserve to implement three quarter-point rate hikes in 2026 — in September, October, and December — lifting the federal funds rate to 4.25%–4.50% . This was a complete reversal from its earlier forecast of rate cuts.
BofA said inflation was getting "unambiguously worse," with core PCE expected to come in at an annual rate of 3.5%, reflecting the impact of tariffs and temporary price surges . The bank's revised forecast was seen as a major hawkish signal, amplifying the tightening narrative already visible in futures markets
.
Deutsche Bank followed with a forecast of two hikes, adding to the sense that Wall Street was rapidly converging on a tightening outlook .
One of the most striking features of the current gold selloff is that it has occurred despite continued central bank purchases. For months, analysts had pointed to strong institutional demand — including reported buying by the People's Bank of China — as a structural support for gold prices.
There are three reasons why that support has not been enough:
Macro forces dominate micro demand. A hawkish pivot from the Fed is a powerful macro headwind that can overwhelm even sustained structural demand. Futures markets priced a much higher probability of two Fed hikes this year, while Bank of America forecast three hikes in 2026 . Higher expected policy rates strengthen the dollar and raise the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding gold.
Inflation and geopolitical pressure reinforced the tightening story. The June Fed-odds backdrop cited persistent inflation pressure, including a recent spike tied to geopolitical tensions . That reinforced the case for tighter policy, putting further downward pressure on gold.
Oil/geopolitical risk cut both ways for gold. Escalation around the Strait of Hormuz initially raised crude-supply concerns and inflation risk, which pushed gold lower as markets priced in tighter Fed policy. When the tentative US-Iran deal was announced, oil prices fell and risk sentiment improved — also reducing demand for gold as a safe haven . Geopolitical risk, in other words, has been a net negative for gold in this cycle.
The key risk for gold in the near term is that stronger US economic data — particularly nonfarm payrolls — could reinforce the hawkish repricing already visible in Fed-funds futures and bank forecasts . With rate-hike probabilities elevated and Bank of America amplifying the tightening narrative, central bank buying may provide a floor but not necessarily a catalyst for a sustained reversal.
Bank of America has maintained its long-term $6,000 gold target but pushed out the timeline, acknowledging that near-term Fed tightening and a more than 70% chance of a September 2026 rate hike weigh on pricing . The gold outlook now depends critically on whether upcoming data confirms the hawkish narrative — or gives markets reason to scale back rate hike expectations.