Despite the June 15 U.S. Iran interim peace deal and the scheduled June 19 reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, PetroChina and Indian Oil Corporation have been unable to book very large crude carriers (VLCCs) for Iraqi...

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: What explains the ongoing inability of PetroChina and Indian Oil Corporation to book very large crude carriers for Iraqi Basrah crude in lat. Article summary: Despite the June 15 U.S.-Iran interim peace deal and the scheduled June 19 reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, PetroChina and Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) have been unable to book very large crude carriers (VLCCs) for Ira. Topic tags: general, general web, news, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts w
The June 15 U.S.-Iran interim peace deal and the scheduled June 19 reopening of the Strait of Hormuz were supposed to end the shipping crisis that has paralyzed crude flows from the Persian Gulf. Instead, PetroChina and Indian Oil Corporation (IOC) found themselves unable to book a single very large crude carrier (VLCC) for Iraqi Basrah crude loadings in late June — and IOC was forced to declare force majeure on its Iraqi liftings .
The disconnect between a signed peace agreement and a functioning shipping market is stark. Here is what is blocking the tankers.
Marine war-risk premiums for the Persian Gulf remain roughly 30 times pre-conflict levels — averaging 2.5% to 5% of vessel hull value per transit, compared to 0.1–0.25% before the war . The Additional War Risk Premium (AWRP) for a seven-day period in the Gulf is running at about $40,000, roughly four times normal
. Insurers have not reduced rates because the physical security environment in the waterway has not changed. A single VLCC valued at $200 million faces a war-risk insurance bill of $5 million to $10 million for one transit through the Strait of Hormuz
.
Underwriters will not bring premiums back to normal levels until independent observers confirm clean safe passage over multiple successive transits . That process has not even begun.
South Korea's Sinokor Merchant Marine executed the most aggressive VLCC buying campaign in shipping history in early 2026. In the first weeks of January alone, Sinokor acquired 35 of the 45 VLCCs sold globally — 78% of all transaction volume — effectively absorbing nearly all available market liquidity . By late February, Sinokor controlled approximately 118–120 VLCCs, representing roughly 17% of the mainstream VLCC fleet and an estimated one-third of the globally traded VLCC fleet
.
This consolidation dramatically reduced the pool of non-sanctioned, commercially available VLCCs for spot charters. The timing was catastrophic: Sinokor locked up the compliant fleet just before the Strait of Hormuz closure sent demand for those same vessels through the roof .
An estimated 118 tankers remain stranded inside the Persian Gulf, unable to move since the crisis began . These vessels cannot begin clearing until safe corridors are verified, a process expected to take at least 15 days after the formal Geneva signing on June 19
. Even when they do clear, they will not immediately become available for new Basrah loadings — most are already contracted or entangled in insurance and crew logistics
.
Despite the peace deal, VLCC spot rates as of June 17 remained about 106% above pre-conflict levels . The massive overhang of stranded tonnage and the structural shortage of available compliant vessels means the rate collapse that analysts predicted has simply not materialized
. Before the conflict, VLCC earnings from the Middle East Gulf to China had already surged from roughly $79,000 per day in January 2026 to $218,000 per day by late February, reaching an all-time high of $424,000 per day in early March
. Those levels are not coming down fast.
Southern Iraqi oil production collapsed by 70–80% during the crisis, from about 3.3 million barrels per day (bpd) to roughly 900,000 bpd in March . By early June, output was recovering toward 1 million bpd, but storage is full, damaged infrastructure has not been fully repaired, and the restart schedule is chaotic
. The head of Iraq's Basra Oil Company said exports could theoretically return to 3.4 million bpd within a week of Hormuz reopening, but that assumes a smooth ramp-up that does not account for physical damage, manpower shortages, and the risk of quality issues with stored crude
.
Physical normalization of the Strait of Hormuz is a separate, far slower process than the political deal . The waterway was heavily mined during the conflict, and naval mine-clearing operations have not been completed. Vessel operators are unwilling to commit expensive VLCCs — each valued at $80–200 million — to a transit route that may still contain live naval mines, unexploded ordnance, or debris
.
IOC has already invoked force majeure on its Iraqi crude liftings, a rare step signaling that the supply chain disruption is recognized as beyond the company's control . Sinochem is also still searching for tankers, indicating the shortage is affecting Asian buyers broadly
. IOC has issued tenders to charter a very large gas carrier (VLGC), a Suezmax tanker, and a VLCC — its first such tenders since the peace deal — but securing vessels remains difficult
.
The peace deal lifted the legal blockade. It did not clear the mines, reprice the insurance, unfreeze the stranded vessels, increase Iraq's export capacity, or undo Sinokor's market consolidation. The shipping market is caught between a political green light and a physical-operational reality that remains red.
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.
Despite the June 15 U.S. Iran interim peace deal and the scheduled June 19 reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, PetroChina and Indian Oil Corporation have been unable to book very large crude carriers (VLCCs) for Iraqi...
Loading comments...
Comments
0 comments