This left SpaceX with billions of dollars worth of cutting-edge Nvidia GPU infrastructure sitting idle. Rather than absorbing the cost, the company began leasing the capacity to the very rivals that had beaten Grok in the market.
SpaceX's transformation was disclosed in three separate agreements, each more stunning than the last.
Disclosed in SpaceX's May 20, 2026 S-1 filing, Anthropic—the creator of Claude, a direct Grok competitor—agreed to pay $1.25 billion per month for access to the Colossus data centers through May 2029 . Annualized, that's $15 billion per year, a figure that nearly matches the combined revenue of SpaceX's space and connectivity businesses in 2025
. Over the full contract term, it represents up to $45 billion in revenue
.
The economics are astonishing. According to analysis of the filing, SpaceX can recoup its entire AI infrastructure capital expenditure in under one month from this single deal—or 2.2 months even if costs were double the disclosed amount .
On June 5, 2026, just one week before the IPO, SpaceX amended its S-1 to reveal a second blockbuster deal. Google agreed to pay $920 million per month from October 2026 through June 2029 for access to roughly 110,000 Nvidia GPUs and associated infrastructure .
Google described the arrangement as a "short-term, timely agreement to ensure we have bridge capacity" to meet surging demand for its Gemini Enterprise AI platform . The total commitment is approximately $30 billion over the life of the deal
.
Together, the Anthropic and Google contracts give SpaceX an annualized AI cloud revenue run rate of roughly $26 billion .
A third agreement, signed April 19, 2026 with Anysphere—the creator of the wildly popular AI coding tool Cursor—goes beyond simple compute leasing. In addition to a GPU capacity contract, SpaceX secured an option to acquire Cursor at an implied equity value of $60 billion, exercisable between 7 and 30 business days after the IPO .
Cursor is currently at an estimated $3 billion in annualized revenue . If exercised, this option would give SpaceX a high-growth AI software franchise, further blurring the line between a launch company, a satellite operator, and an AI conglomerate.
While the headline revenue numbers are staggering, the structure of these deals introduces extraordinary fragility to SpaceX's new business model. Key risks include:
90-day termination clauses: Both the Anthropic and Google agreements allow either party to cancel with just 90 days' notice . These are not long-term locked-in contracts; they are effectively short-term leases that either side can walk away from in a single fiscal quarter. Elon Musk himself publicly described the Anthropic arrangement as a "180-day lease with a mutual 90-day cancellation notice thereafter," contradicting earlier descriptions of a years-long commitment
.
Extreme customer concentration: A very large portion of the AI division's revenue comes from just two customers—Anthropic and Google. If either exercises the cancellation clause, the AI revenue story could collapse quickly .
SpaceX can reclaim capacity: The S-1 filing discloses that SpaceX retains the right to reclaim compute capacity for its own use, which could disrupt customer commitments and revenues at the company's discretion .
Massive underlying losses: Despite the enormous new revenue streams, SpaceX's AI division remains deeply unprofitable. The division posted an operating loss of $2.469 billion in Q1 2026 alone—nearly equal to the entire company's 2025 operating loss of $2.589 billion . The total company reported a net loss of $4.28 billion in Q1 2026 against an accumulated deficit of $41.3 billion
.
For anyone considering SPCX stock, the core investment thesis now rests on a delicate balance:
The AI revenue is real, but unproven. The $26 billion annualized cloud run rate is a legitimate and transformative source of income that didn't exist six months ago. It is offsetting losses from other divisions and providing a powerful growth narrative. However, not a single dollar of this revenue is locked in beyond a 90-day risk window.
The valuation demands flawless execution. At $1.75 trillion, SPCX is priced like a tech giant—larger than Microsoft, trailing only Apple and Nvidia . Yet the company is deeply unprofitable and carries a price-to-sales ratio of roughly 93.7 based on 2025 consolidated revenue of $18.674 billion
. Investors are paying an extraordinary premium for a business in the early stages of a high-risk transformation.
The Anysphere option is a potential catalyst. If SpaceX exercises its right to acquire Cursor shortly after the IPO, it would add a fast-growing AI coding platform to the portfolio, potentially strengthening the long-term software story . However, a $60 billion acquisition would also be a massive outlay for a company already bleeding cash.
The ultimate takeaway is fragility. SPCX offers exposure to a uniquely diversified portfolio spanning space launch, satellite connectivity, and AI infrastructure. The AI compute deals are genuinely impressive and have fundamentally changed the company's revenue profile. But investors are paying a premium for revenue that is unproven over the long term, highly concentrated in two customers, and cancellable on a moment's notice. Any strategic shift by Anthropic or Google could materially change the company's financial picture within a single quarter. As one analyst noted, "the IPO story now depends partly on SpaceX becoming an AI infrastructure business"—and that story is still being written .
Comments
0 comments