Google described the arrangement as “bridge capacity” to meet surging demand for its Gemini Enterprise AI services, calling it a short-term agreement in an environment of extreme supply constraints .
In a research note following the disclosure, BNP Paribas analyst Stefan Slowinski made the case that Google’s deal with SpaceX is an independent validation of just how tight the AI compute market remains—and why that directly supports a bullish thesis on Microsoft’s Azure cloud business .
Three pieces of logic anchor the argument:
1. Demand is outstripping even the largest hyperscalers. Google operates its own custom TPU infrastructure and is one of the world’s largest cloud providers. Yet it still needed to go outside its own walls and pay $920 million a month for external GPU capacity. Slowinski’s read: if Google can’t satisfy its own AI compute needs internally, no one can, which means the supply-demand imbalance is durable .
2. Pricing power is moving to cloud platforms. The deal demonstrates that pricing leverage for AI inference compute—the kind of workloads that run on large, schedulable GPU clusters—is shifting toward the operators of those clusters . BNP views this as directly positive for Azure’s ability to command premium pricing as enterprises race to deploy AI workloads.
3. Short-term contracts don’t diminish the long-term signal. Slowinski acknowledged that the SpaceX-Google deal and similar recent agreements (such as SpaceX’s $1.25 billion monthly deal with Anthropic) are structured as short-term contracts in a supply-constrained market. But he stressed that they “nonetheless further underscore the robust demand for cloud AI infrastructure” .
The implication: if pricing strengthens further when these contracts come up for renewal, Azure’s growth trajectory could exceed current consensus estimates, potentially pushing into the mid-40% range .
BNP Paribas already held a bullish posture on Microsoft before the SpaceX-Google deal. Slowinski had been modeling Azure growth above 40% over the next several quarters, aided by capacity expansions at new data center facilities in Wisconsin and Atlanta . The SpaceX deal reinforces that view by providing external evidence that the AI infrastructure shortage is real and ongoing
.
Beyond Azure infrastructure, BNP also projects Microsoft could exceed 25 million paid Copilot seats by the end of fiscal 2026, up more than 10 million over the prior two quarters—adding another layer of AI-driven consumption revenue on top of Azure’s core growth .
Slowinski maintains an Outperform (or Outperform-equivalent) rating on Microsoft with a $555 price target . That target was trimmed from $659 earlier in 2026, a reduction driven by Microsoft’s sharply higher capex outlook—BNP expects spending to reach approximately $150 billion in fiscal 2027—and broader software valuation compression
. Despite the lower price target, Slowinski kept the Outperform rating intact, signaling conviction that the long-term AI demand story remains intact even as near-term spending weighs on sentiment
.
As of early June 2026, Microsoft shares traded near $403 , implying roughly 33–38% upside to BNP’s $555 target. The broader Wall Street consensus sat higher, with an average analyst price target around $561 and a high estimate of $730
.
The SpaceX-Google deal is the second blockbuster compute lease SpaceX has signed in weeks, following a $1.25 billion monthly agreement with Anthropic . Together, they position SpaceX as a kind of AI compute landlord, converting GPU clusters into recurring, rent-like revenue streams ahead of its highly anticipated IPO
.
For Microsoft investors, the takeaway is that the AI infrastructure buildout is not a bubble about to pop—it’s a supply-constrained market where capacity commands premium pricing. Google’s willingness to pay nearly a billion dollars a month to a competitor for GPU access suggests Azure’s own massive compute investments could generate substantial returns for years to come.
Comments
0 comments