This diversity is intentional: NIST typically evaluates candidates from different mathematical foundations so that a weakness discovered in one family does not undermine the entire post‑quantum ecosystem.
Before this announcement, 14 algorithms had advanced to the second round of the additional‑signatures process.
The following five candidates did not move forward to Round 3:
Earlier documentation grouped these schemes into several approaches, including code‑based designs (CROSS, LESS) and MPC‑in‑the‑Head constructions (Mirath, PERK, RYDE).
The provided sources confirm that these algorithms were part of the previous round but do not include NIST’s detailed technical reasons for eliminating them, such as potential security concerns, performance issues, or implementation complexity. As a result, the precise evaluation rationale is not specified in the available evidence.
According to NIST’s announcement, the nine remaining algorithms will proceed to further analysis and evaluation in Round 3.
The supplied sources confirm that the third round follows approximately 18 months of evaluation but do not include detailed information about allowed specification updates or the full timeline extending through 2027.
Typically in NIST cryptographic competitions, later rounds involve deeper scrutiny of:
However, the exact update rules and deadlines for this specific stage are not described in the sources provided.
The announcement fits into a broader global effort to secure digital systems against future quantum computers, which could break widely used cryptographic systems such as RSA and elliptic‑curve cryptography.
The Additional Digital Signatures project exists because the first batch of standards does not cover every use case. By continuing to evaluate more algorithms, NIST aims to:
In short, the nine algorithms now in Round 3 represent the next generation of candidates that could eventually become official post‑quantum digital signature standards, helping governments, companies, and infrastructure providers prepare for the quantum era.
Comments
0 comments