The Copilot+ PC name is fading from Microsoft’s new Surface marketing, but the capabilities behind it have not been canceled. Surface executive Brett Ostrum confirmed that the new systems are not called Copilot+ PCs, while reporting on his comments says they still meet the category’s hardware requirements and support its features. Microsoft also continues to use the name in its Windows documentation and business marketing.
19
1
32
47
How the branding retreat became visible
Microsoft introduced the Copilot+ PC category alongside its first Snapdragon X systems in May 2024. By June 2026, the Surface Laptop Ultra reveal emphasized Nvidia-powered AI computing without using the Copilot+ PC label, according to contemporary coverage. PCMag likewise observed that Build 2026 promoted AI and locally running agents without making the AI-first PC brand central to its message. Those are signals of a change in emphasis, not a formal retirement announcement.
54
1
41
52
The stronger signal came in September. Windows Central reported that new Surface PCs were no longer called Copilot+ PCs even though they would support Copilot+ features. Ostrum’s confirmation concerns the name, not an end to on-device AI. Reporting also describes other PC makers pulling back from the label in product names and marketing.
19
1
5
The shift has not been perfectly consistent. A June report described new Surface Pro and Surface Laptop models as still bearing Copilot+ branding, while Microsoft’s current Surface support material continues to list qualifying devices under the category. It is more accurate to say Microsoft is reducing the label’s prominence than that it has erased the term everywhere.
42
48
Why the label may have lost appeal
Copilot+ launched with an ambitious hardware promise, but its early story was complicated by questions about Windows on Arm app compatibility and by Recall. Reporting describes security and privacy criticism that delayed Recall’s rollout; Microsoft still lists it as a preview feature. These issues offer context for a less prominent label, but the supplied evidence does not establish how much any one of them drove Microsoft’s decision.
15
33
32
Microsoft has separately said it is reducing unnecessary Copilot entry points in Windows and focusing AI integration on experiences it considers useful. That supports a broader change in how the company presents AI, but it is not a stated explanation for the Surface naming decision. Nor is there evidence here to quantify consumer sentiment toward the Copilot brand.
26
What still qualifies as a Copilot+ PC?
Microsoft’s published consumer requirements specify an NPU capable of at least 40 trillion operations per second (40 TOPS), 16 GB of RAM, a 256 GB SSD and Windows 11 version 24H2 or newer. Those specifications matter more than whether a product page displays the old badge. They also mean that not every new Surface configuration qualifies: Windows Central reported that 8 GB versions of some Surface models fall short of the RAM minimum and do not ship with Copilot+ features.
47
12
Microsoft still lists Recall (preview), Click to Do, improved Windows search, Live Captions with translation and Windows Studio Effects among Copilot+ experiences. Recall is intended to help users find previously viewed material by describing what they remember; Microsoft’s business page also notes IT controls for it. Microsoft describes several of these experiences as running locally on the device. That is distinct from saying every Copilot interaction runs locally: Windows AI experiences can involve both on-device and cloud processing, depending on the feature.
32
46
54
39
The name remains on Microsoft’s consumer explanations, business pages and Surface support site, as well as HP’s feature guide. Its disappearance from some new-device marketing therefore does not mean that the technical category, its requirements or its software have disappeared. For buyers, the practical check is the exact configuration and supported features—not the presence of a Copilot+ sticker.
47
32
48
34
Is this like the reported Windows 12 pullback?
There is a limited parallel: reporting about Build 2026 framed Microsoft’s Windows plans around improving Windows 11 rather than promoting a separately named Windows 12 release. In both cases, work on the underlying product can continue without a new or prominent brand. But that comparison is an interpretation, not evidence of a shared Microsoft strategy or a permanent cancellation of either name.
7
26