The timing of the strikes was a harsh blow to the diplomatic process. Al-Monitor reported that the attacks imperiled a fragile ceasefire and cast new doubt on a deal to end the Middle East war. Oil prices fluctuated in the wake of the military action, reflecting market anxiety that an agreement to reopen the strategic waterway might collapse .
The backdrop to the strikes was a deal that President Donald Trump himself said was "largely negotiated" as recently as Saturday, May 23 . The fact that hostilities resumed as negotiators touched down in Qatar dangerously eroded trust, an essential ingredient for finalizing the agreement.
Despite the military flare-up, diplomatic efforts did not halt. Secretary of State Marco Rubio acknowledged the Qatar talks continued, stating, "There were some talks going on in Qatar today, so we'll see if we can get it back on track" .
The proposed agreement, reported by Axios and other outlets citing a draft Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) from U.S. officials, outlines a phased, 60-day framework to wind down the three-month-old war . The core components would unfold in the following sequence:
What Iran would do:
What the U.S. would do in exchange:
While the framework appears straightforward on paper, several critical points remain unresolved and are the subject of intense negotiation:
The near-completed MOU now hangs in a precarious balance. The trust required to bridge the remaining gaps on uranium, sequencing, and verification has been dangerously eroded by Monday's strikes. While diplomatic channels remain open and key officials insist a deal is still achievable, the military shock has made a complex, fragile negotiation even more volatile .
Comments
0 comments