| Reported EBITDA | DKK 5.42B | DKK 6.64B | Miss (dragged by no partnership income) |
| Revenue (Q2 consensus) | Not specified vs. avg. of DKK 15.94B | ~DKK 24.66B (H1) | Mixed signals |
| Net Profit | DKK 518M (~$79.9M) | DKK 3.10B | Collapse (-83%) |
| EPS | ~DKK 0.07 | DKK 0.21 | In line with estimate |
The beat on EBITDA (5.44B actual vs. 5.1B consensus) was powered by stronger-than-expected operational performance from the offshore wind fleet, as higher generation volumes translated into higher core earnings before the below-the-line charges were applied .
Ørsted confirmed it is on track to deliver on its 2026 financial guidance, with group EBITDA (excl. new partnerships and cancellation fees) expected to exceed DKK 28 billion for the full year . This suggests management sees the impairment issue as a one-time, non-cash hit that does not change the underlying operational momentum of the business.
| Reported EBITDA | DKK 5.42B | DKK 6.64B | Miss (dragged by no partnership income) |
| Revenue (Q2 consensus) | Not specified vs. avg. of DKK 15.94B | ~DKK 24.66B (H1) | Mixed signals |
| Net Profit | DKK 518M (~$79.9M) | DKK 3.10B | Collapse (-83%) |
| EPS | ~DKK 0.07 | DKK 0.21 | In line with estimate |
The beat on EBITDA (5.44B actual vs. 5.1B consensus) was powered by stronger-than-expected operational performance from the offshore wind fleet, as higher generation volumes translated into higher core earnings before the below-the-line charges were applied .
Ørsted confirmed it is on track to deliver on its 2026 financial guidance, with group EBITDA (excl. new partnerships and cancellation fees) expected to exceed DKK 28 billion for the full year . This suggests management sees the impairment issue as a one-time, non-cash hit that does not change the underlying operational momentum of the business.