AnswersPublished18 sources
Why Molleindustria Removed AI Voices From *Future? No Thanks!*—But Defended His AI Use
After backlash over his AI disclosure, Paolo Pedercini replaced two synthetic character voices in Future? He said roughly 99% of the game’s code predated viable AI coding tools; he also promised to hand code his next project.
Published byEdited with GPT-6 LunaImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer
Key takeaways
- After backlash over his AI disclosure, Paolo Pedercini replaced two synthetic character voices in Future?
- He said roughly 99% of the game’s code predated viable AI coding tools; he also promised to hand code his next project.
AI Prompt
openai.comCreate a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: How did Paolo Pedercini, known as Molleindustria, respond to the backlash over generative AI in his ecosocialist satire Future? No Thanks!,. Article summary: Pedercini’s response combined practical concessions with a defense of his limited AI use: he removed the two synthetic character voices, offered refunds, and promised to hand-code his next game, while maintaining that th. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fak
Paolo Pedercini, the developer behind Molleindustria, responded to criticism of generative AI in Future? No Thanks! with a mix of changes and pushback. He replaced two text-to-speech character voices and offered refunds to players who felt misled, but continued to defend his limited use of AI and the original voices’ role in the satire. 7
12
What Pedercini disclosed about AI use
In an October 17 post, Pedercini described AI as “a technofascist, anti-human and anti-art project” while acknowledging that Future? No Thanks! was not entirely AI-free. He said about 99% of the game’s code had been written before AI was viable as a coding tool, and that he used ChatGPT or Claude to assist with a tiny fraction of the code late in development—not to generate the game wholesale. 4
11
Reporting described the coding assistance as finishing and debugging work, including help with a shader that had broken after an update. 40 Pedercini’s disclosure also said the game’s first released version included two brief text-to-speech voices: one for an automated toilet and another for a hair-salon translator.
4
He replaced the voices, but said they worked as satire
In an October 23 update, Pedercini replaced both synthetic voices with a human pretending to be a robot. He said the human performances had been recorded earlier in the year, but he had chosen the uncanny text-to-speech versions because he found them funnier in context. 7
The update addressed the visible AI-generated voices, not every instance of AI assistance in the game. Pedercini characterized the change as giving players a version without AI-generated voices; his original disclosure still described a small amount of AI-supported code. 4
7
Refunds and a hand-coded next project
Pedercini offered to refund buyers who still felt “betrayed,” asking them to contact him with PayPal or Venmo details. 7
12 He also said his next project would be completely hand-coded.
3
14
The response therefore stopped short of a wholesale retraction of his earlier position. He made a concrete concession by replacing the voices and offering refunds, while maintaining that the original synthetic performances served the game’s satire. In reporting on the update, he was quoted as saying the game was “0.001% worse” without them. 1
Studio Global AI
Continue your research
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
People also ask
What is the short answer to "Why Molleindustria Removed AI Voices From *Future? No Thanks!*—But Defended His AI Use"?
After backlash over his AI disclosure, Paolo Pedercini replaced two synthetic character voices in Future?
What are the key points to validate first?
After backlash over his AI disclosure, Paolo Pedercini replaced two synthetic character voices in Future? He said roughly 99% of the game’s code predated viable AI coding tools; he also promised to hand code his next project.
Sources
molleindustria.orgFuture? No Thanks! Update: now with no AI generated voices!
rockpapershotgun.comFuture? No Thanks! dev removes AI-generated voices from game and offers refunds to players who feel "betrayed"