Oil prices dropped sharply on November 4, 2026, after Democrats won control of both chambers of Congress. Traders appeared to read the result as increasing the possibility of an earlier end to the U.S.-Israeli war with Iran. European gas, however, sent a less straightforward signal: an early report showed prices rising, while a separate market tracker recorded a lower value later in the day.
1
6
15
31
Oil: an early dip became a steep daily decline
During the session, reports placed Brent near $100–$102 a barrel. One update quoted Brent at $100.44, down 3%, while another put it at $100.97, down about 2.5%.
5
7 By settlement, a Reuters report said Brent had fallen 8.7% to $94.62, with U.S. West Texas Intermediate down 8.3% to $88.12.
15 A separate account gave a different settlement figure for the January 2027 Brent contract, underscoring that contract and reporting differences matter when comparing prices.
3
The main market interpretation was political, not a confirmation that the conflict or supply risks had ended. Reports said investors viewed the Democratic win as potentially hastening an end to the war, while uncertainty remained over whether Washington would pursue diplomacy or further military action.
1
9
15
European gas: early gains, but no single clear daily reading
An early report put Dutch TTF front-month gas at €93/MWh, up 1.6%, as traders weighed the election result alongside uncertainty over Hormuz and LNG supply.
6 A separate tracker later listed European gas at €84.48/MWh, down 7.77% for the day.
31 Those figures come from different instruments and reporting snapshots, so they should not be treated as directly comparable prices or as a definitive account of one contract’s settlement.
The early rise reflected concerns that political uncertainty and shipping risks could continue to affect gas supplies. One report also cited European storage at around 74% and constrained LNG flows through the Strait of Hormuz.
30 Those factors help explain why gas could remain sensitive to supply headlines even as oil prices fell on hopes for diplomacy.
Why the Iran outlook remained the key uncertainty
The election did not resolve the conflict. Reports around the same period described a U.S. strike on Iran’s Qeshm Island and an Iranian official’s view that a deal remained distant.
20
21 That mix of military escalation and uncertain negotiations left markets weighing two competing possibilities: progress toward ending the war, or further disruption to energy shipments.
For oil, the election-linked shift in expectations was enough to coincide with a steep price decline. For European gas, the immediate supply concerns tied to Hormuz and LNG flows remained relevant. The clearest conclusion from November 4 is therefore not that energy markets agreed on the outlook, but that oil fell on hopes for a less risky path while gas reporting reflected continued concern about near-term supply—and the available gas figures vary by instrument and timing.