IBM’s third-quarter 2026 results showed a clear acceleration from the company’s sluggish second quarter: revenue grew 5% year over year, or 6% at constant currency, and adjusted earnings per share topped Wall Street estimates. IBM also raised its full-year free-cash-flow growth outlook, but kept its revenue-growth forecast unchanged at 4%–5%.
5
9
17
Revenue and earnings topped estimates
IBM reported revenue of $17.10 billion, compared with an average analyst estimate of $16.82 billion. Adjusted earnings per share were $2.95, versus an estimate of $2.86. Consensus figures vary somewhat by provider, but the cited estimates all indicate a beat.
5
12
13
Revenue was up 5% from a year earlier on a reported basis and 6% at constant currency, which adjusts for foreign-exchange movements. Adjusted EPS increased 11% year over year.
9
15
| Measure |
Q3 2026 result |
Comparison |
| Revenue |
$17.10 billion |
$16.82 billion expected; up 5% reported and 6% at constant currency 5 9 |
| Adjusted EPS |
$2.95 |
$2.86 expected; up 11% year over year 5 9 |
| GAAP net income |
$2.19 billion |
Up from $1.74 billion a year earlier 5 |
| GAAP gross margin |
56.8% |
Down 0.5 percentage points year over year 15 |
| Free cash flow |
$3.027 billion |
Up from $2.373 billion a year earlier 36 |
The results marked faster year-over-year growth, not a rise in revenue from the prior quarter: Q2 revenue was $17.2 billion, up just 1% from a year earlier. Q2 adjusted EPS was $2.93, compared with $2.95 in Q3.
21
Software led; consulting remained comparatively subdued
Software was IBM’s strongest major segment by growth. It generated $7.8 billion in revenue, up 8% reported and 9% at constant currency. Constant-currency growth accelerated by about four percentage points from Q2.
11
15
Within software, Red Hat revenue grew 11%. Data grew 19% on a reported basis; other coverage put data growth at 20% at constant currency. Automation declined 3%, according to segment reporting.
15
33
36
Infrastructure revenue grew 5% at constant currency. Distributed infrastructure was a standout, with coverage reporting growth of 32%; IBM also said it had recovered roughly two-thirds of mainframe and related software deals that customers had postponed earlier in the year.
1
22
38
Consulting growth was modest: IBM described it as a slight improvement, with coverage reporting 2% growth at constant currency.
1
8
These segment figures do not mean every business beat its own analyst forecast. The available estimates support a company-wide revenue and adjusted-EPS beat, but do not provide a consistent forecast comparison for every segment.
5
12
Free-cash-flow outlook rose; revenue guidance held steady
IBM increased its expectation for full-year free cash flow to grow by more than $1 billion year over year. In July, the company had forecast an increase of about $1 billion. It kept its 2026 constant-currency revenue-growth outlook at 4%–5%, the range set after Q2.
17
26
Management said Q3’s 6% constant-currency revenue growth exceeded the base case it had laid out in July. CEO Arvind Krishna described clients using “Super Intelligence” to transform entire operating models, rather than address only narrow problems.
1
15
A stronger quarter, but mixed signals on the share reaction
IBM’s Q2 slowdown had prompted it to lower its full-year revenue-growth forecast in July, after revenue came in below its own expectations. The Q3 acceleration therefore offered evidence of a rebound, though the unchanged annual revenue outlook stopped short of a new growth forecast.
20
26
Coverage of the immediate share reaction was inconsistent: some reports described an after-hours rise, while Investing.com reported a 3.66% after-hours decline following a 3.96% gain during the regular session. Without a consistent timestamp across reports, the immediate direction is not clear from the available accounts.
16
18
The overall picture is a quarterly beat led by software, stronger cash generation and a higher free-cash-flow target. But reported gross margin was lower year over year, consulting growth remained modest, and IBM retained its existing annual revenue-growth range.
1
8
15