This was not an isolated bearish move. Reports from the same period indicated that other whales had been deploying similar strategies. Source noted a separate whale depositing 34.74 million USDT into Aave V3 and borrowing 9,000 ETH to transfer to Binance, while source tracked another entity that opened a 10x leveraged short on 21,948 ETH, worth about $44 million, with a liquidation price set at $2,339.76. A third whale reportedly deposited $132 million into Aave V3 specifically to borrow and sell 35,000 ETH .

The Bullish Counterpart: $316M in Stablecoin Borrows to Buy ETH

In stark contrast, a powerful wave of buying pressure was building from other Aave users. The most prominent example was a whale that borrowed $142 million USDT from Aave over roughly 30 hours and used the entire sum to purchase 87,680 ETH at an average price of about $1,620 . This was a straightforward leveraged long: borrow a stablecoin against deposited collateral, then use that stablecoin to acquire a volatile asset expected to appreciate.

The position was exceptionally large and carried immediate risk. The whale's health factor on Aave dropped to 1.16, with a liquidation trigger set at $1,354.51 — only about a 16% decline from the entry price . A drop below that threshold would allow the protocol to automatically sell the whale’s collateral to cover the loan, potentially adding significant sell-side pressure to the market.

This was not the only bullish operation. On-chain data from the same window shows multiple other whales using Aave to accumulate ETH:

• A dormant whale, inactive for three years, returned on June 5 to deposit 20,000 ETH into Aave V3, borrow 30 million USDT, and buy 17,826 ETH at $1,683 each .
• A separate entity used two addresses to borrow approximately 44.42 million USDT from Aave and purchase 25,851 ETH at an entry price near $1,718. One address carried a health factor of 1.23 with a liquidation price of $1,355 .
• Analyst Yu Jin tracked a whale borrowing 100 million USDT through Aave to acquire 59,742 ETH at an average price of $1,681. The overall address held 133,800 ETH worth approximately $212 million and was already showing an unrealized loss of about $6 million .

How the Trades Worked on Aave

Both strategies relied on Aave's permissionless lending architecture, which allows users to deposit one asset as collateral and borrow another without a counterparty or credit check. The divergence in early June illustrates the protocol's utility for both bulls and bears:

• For shorts: A whale deposits a stablecoin (like USDT or USDC) as collateral to borrow ETH. The borrowed ETH is sold on the market. If the price falls, the whale repurchases the ETH at a lower cost, repays the loan, and retains the profit.
• For longs: A whale deposits ETH or another accepted asset as collateral and borrows a stablecoin. The stablecoin is then used to buy more ETH. If the price rises, the whale can sell a portion of the position to repay the loan and keep the appreciation.

The risk in both cases is liquidation. If the value of the collateral falls too close to the value of the loan, Aave's smart contracts can automatically seize the collateral and sell it to repay the debt. For the $142M USDT long position, that liquidation point was $1,354.51 . For the 10x leveraged 21,948 ETH short, it was $2,339.76 per ETH .

A Market Divided

The on-chain data from early June 2026 reveals a market struggling for direction. A concentrated cohort of whales bet aggressively that ETH would continue falling, using Aave to borrow and sell the asset. At the same time, an even larger group of buyers — deploying over $316 million in borrowed stablecoins — treated the mid-$1,600 range as a buying opportunity .

The simultaneous long and short activity on the same permissionless rails underscores how Aave has become a critical battleground for large, directional crypto wagers. Every major position carries a publicly visible liquidation level, turning each whale's conviction into a price level that the rest of the market can watch.

This was not an isolated bearish move. Reports from the same period indicated that other whales had been deploying similar strategies. Source noted a separate whale depositing 34.74 million USDT into Aave V3 and borrowing 9,000 ETH to transfer to Binance, while source tracked another entity that opened a 10x leveraged short on 21,948 ETH, worth about $44 million, with a liquidation price set at $2,339.76. A third whale reportedly deposited $132 million into Aave V3 specifically to borrow and sell 35,000 ETH .

The Bullish Counterpart: $316M in Stablecoin Borrows to Buy ETH

In stark contrast, a powerful wave of buying pressure was building from other Aave users. The most prominent example was a whale that borrowed $142 million USDT from Aave over roughly 30 hours and used the entire sum to purchase 87,680 ETH at an average price of about $1,620 . This was a straightforward leveraged long: borrow a stablecoin against deposited collateral, then use that stablecoin to acquire a volatile asset expected to appreciate.

The position was exceptionally large and carried immediate risk. The whale's health factor on Aave dropped to 1.16, with a liquidation trigger set at $1,354.51 — only about a 16% decline from the entry price . A drop below that threshold would allow the protocol to automatically sell the whale’s collateral to cover the loan, potentially adding significant sell-side pressure to the market.

This was not the only bullish operation. On-chain data from the same window shows multiple other whales using Aave to accumulate ETH:

• A dormant whale, inactive for three years, returned on June 5 to deposit 20,000 ETH into Aave V3, borrow 30 million USDT, and buy 17,826 ETH at $1,683 each .
• A separate entity used two addresses to borrow approximately 44.42 million USDT from Aave and purchase 25,851 ETH at an entry price near $1,718. One address carried a health factor of 1.23 with a liquidation price of $1,355 .
• Analyst Yu Jin tracked a whale borrowing 100 million USDT through Aave to acquire 59,742 ETH at an average price of $1,681. The overall address held 133,800 ETH worth approximately $212 million and was already showing an unrealized loss of about $6 million .

How the Trades Worked on Aave

Both strategies relied on Aave's permissionless lending architecture, which allows users to deposit one asset as collateral and borrow another without a counterparty or credit check. The divergence in early June illustrates the protocol's utility for both bulls and bears:

• For shorts: A whale deposits a stablecoin (like USDT or USDC) as collateral to borrow ETH. The borrowed ETH is sold on the market. If the price falls, the whale repurchases the ETH at a lower cost, repays the loan, and retains the profit.
• For longs: A whale deposits ETH or another accepted asset as collateral and borrows a stablecoin. The stablecoin is then used to buy more ETH. If the price rises, the whale can sell a portion of the position to repay the loan and keep the appreciation.

The risk in both cases is liquidation. If the value of the collateral falls too close to the value of the loan, Aave's smart contracts can automatically seize the collateral and sell it to repay the debt. For the $142M USDT long position, that liquidation point was $1,354.51 . For the 10x leveraged 21,948 ETH short, it was $2,339.76 per ETH .

A Market Divided

The on-chain data from early June 2026 reveals a market struggling for direction. A concentrated cohort of whales bet aggressively that ETH would continue falling, using Aave to borrow and sell the asset. At the same time, an even larger group of buyers — deploying over $316 million in borrowed stablecoins — treated the mid-$1,600 range as a buying opportunity .

The simultaneous long and short activity on the same permissionless rails underscores how Aave has become a critical battleground for large, directional crypto wagers. Every major position carries a publicly visible liquidation level, turning each whale's conviction into a price level that the rest of the market can watch.