At the 18 September 2026 Annual Public Service Leadership Ceremony, Chan Chun Sing urged public servants to work with Singaporeans, explain difficult policy trade offs and bring others into solving problems—not assume... He cited the Maju Forest and Gillman Barracks debates to show why officers should acknowledge co...
Published byEdited with GPT-6 SolImages generated with GPT Image 2
Research answer

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: At a September 2026 public service leadership ceremony, how did Chan Chun Sing say Singapore’s public servants should adapt to a more comple. Article summary: At the 18 September 2026 Annual Public Service Leadership Ceremony, Chan Chun Sing argued that public servants must become conveners and problem-solvers, not just providers of government services. In a more complex and c. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated. Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood, clean composition, high detail, modern web publication hero. Use reference image context only for broad subject, composition, and topical grounding; do not copy the exact image. Avoid: logos, brand marks, copyrighted characters, real person likenesses, fake screenshots, UI text, readable text, watermarks, charts with fa
At the Annual Public Service Leadership Ceremony on 18 September 2026, Chan Chun Sing called for a public service that does more than deliver programmes. As Singapore faces more complex challenges, officers should bring people together, make difficult choices understandable and develop solutions that keep the country relevant. 1
22
Chan urged public servants to shift from doing things for Singaporeans to doing things with them. That means listening to different interests, finding common ground and helping groups act towards a shared outcome—not merely seeking agreement on one issue at a time. 1
20
21
It also requires judgement about the government’s role. Officers should consider what the state must do, what citizens and other partners can contribute, and how those contributions can be brought together. The aim is collective action rather than an expectation that government alone will provide every answer. 1
22
Working with people does not mean promising that everyone will get their preferred outcome. Chan pointed to debates over plans for Maju Forest and Gillman Barracks as examples of decisions involving strongly held, differing views. He said the public service should articulate policy trade-offs honestly so people can understand the competing considerations, even when they disagree with the eventual choice. 20
23
Chan described pressures that public servants cannot address through routine administration alone. At home, workforce transformation means responding to disruption from AI while making use of its opportunities, against a changing demographic backdrop. Officers need the judgement to weigh those challenges, not treat technology as a solution by itself. 1
11
Abroad, he called for stronger international links and experience to help Singapore navigate uncertainty. His wider challenge to public service leaders was to create room for Singapore to act, develop distinctive value and mobilise collective action so the country remains a partner of choice at home and overseas. 1
22
24
Chan’s call for leaders to act more like entrepreneurs was a call to anticipate problems and develop better ways of governing, rather than wait for established approaches to stop working. In his account, effective governance matters beyond service delivery: it helps Singapore retain the confidence of its people and its relevance in a contested world. 1
22
Studio Global AI
This page includes a source-backed answer you can continue inside Studio Global.
At the 18 September 2026 Annual Public Service Leadership Ceremony, Chan Chun Sing urged public servants to work with Singaporeans, explain difficult policy trade offs and bring others into solving problems—not assume...
At the 18 September 2026 Annual Public Service Leadership Ceremony, Chan Chun Sing urged public servants to work with Singaporeans, explain difficult policy trade offs and bring others into solving problems—not assume... He cited the Maju Forest and Gillman Barracks debates to show why officers should acknowledge competing interests rather than present policy choices as cost free.