On the first measure, Hong Kong looks relatively strong. On the third, it looks much weaker.
| Measure | Hong Kong data | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Employees using AI at work | PwC Hong Kong says 61% of Hong Kong respondents use AI at work, close to the Asia-Pacific average of 64% and above the global average of 54%. | If the question is whether workers are using AI, Hong Kong is not far behind. |
| Organisations fully ready for AI | A Cisco survey reported by the South China Morning Post found only 2% of Hong Kong organisations were fully prepared for AI adoption, the lowest among 30 surveyed markets; about 2% were classed as “pacesetters”, compared with 13% globally. | If the question is whether companies are ready for mature, large-scale AI adoption, Hong Kong performs poorly. |
| Companies adopting or integrating AI in operations | A survey reported by China Daily HK found 85% of Hong Kong companies had adopted or integrated AI in operations, below 93% in the rest of Asia. | Many firms are touching AI, but Hong Kong is not leading the region on this measure. |
| Organisations widely deploying AI | KPMG says the share of Hong Kong organisations widely deploying AI rose from 8% in 2025 to 24% in 2026. | Deployment is growing, but 24% still means only about one in four organisations have reached broad deployment. |
| Expected future use | The Asset reported that 94% of surveyed employers and 91% of surveyed workers expect to use generative AI tools on the job within five years. | Appetite is high, but expected future use is not the same as mature adoption today. |
The two most striking numbers measure different things. PwC’s 61% figure is about whether people in Hong Kong are using AI at work. Cisco’s 2% figure is about whether organisations are fully prepared to adopt AI.
Those findings are not contradictory. A company can have many employees using AI to draft documents, summarise information or speed up routine tasks, while the organisation itself still lacks the systems needed for responsible, scalable use. That gap — fast individual adoption, slower organisational readiness — is the main story in Hong Kong’s AI market.
On employee use, Hong Kong does not look like a laggard. PwC Hong Kong’s survey found that 61% of local respondents are using AI at work, close to the Asia-Pacific average of 64% and above the global average of 54%.
Among Hong Kong workers who use AI, 77% said it had increased productivity, while 75% said it helped improve the quality of their work. That suggests many frontline users already see practical value in the technology.
Expectations are also high. The Asset reported that 94% of surveyed employers and 91% of surveyed workers expect to use generative AI tools on the job within the next five years.
The harder question is not whether people are experimenting with AI. It is whether companies are ready to deploy it across the business in a controlled, measurable and scalable way.
On that measure, Hong Kong’s position is weaker. The South China Morning Post reported Cisco survey findings showing that only 2% of Hong Kong organisations were fully prepared for AI adoption — the lowest share among 30 surveyed markets. The same survey found only about 2% of Hong Kong organisations were “pacesetters”, compared with 13% globally.
Operational adoption also shows a mixed picture. China Daily HK reported a survey finding that 85% of Hong Kong companies had adopted or integrated AI in operations, but that was still below the 93% rate recorded across the rest of Asia.
There is progress. KPMG says the share of Hong Kong organisations widely deploying AI increased from 8% in 2025 to 24% in 2026. But even at 24%, broad deployment remains far from universal.
Counting how many employees have opened an AI tool can overstate corporate maturity. A more useful test is whether AI has become part of managed, measurable and scalable workflows.
For a Hong Kong organisation, the practical questions are:
These questions separate “people are using AI” from “the organisation is ready for AI”. Based on the public data available, Hong Kong’s main weakness is the second category.
If AI adoption means employee usage, Hong Kong is in decent shape: PwC’s data puts it close to the Asia-Pacific average and above the global average.
If AI adoption means enterprise maturity, readiness and broad deployment, Hong Kong is not yet a clear leader: Cisco’s survey found only 2% of organisations were fully ready for AI adoption, the lowest among 30 surveyed markets.
So the best answer is not simply “ahead” or “behind”. It is this: Hong Kong workers are adopting AI quickly, but many companies are still catching up on readiness, governance and large-scale deployment.
These figures come from different surveys, consultancies, technology companies and media reports. Their samples, questions and definitions of “adoption” are not identical.
That means the 61%, 85%, 24% and 2% figures should not be added together or treated as interchangeable. The more reliable way to read them is to keep the layers separate: employee use, operational integration and organisational readiness. On that basis, the pattern is consistent: Hong Kong has strong AI interest and meaningful workplace use, but enterprise maturity remains the bottleneck.