Morgan Stanley now projects that AI related capital expenditure among the five largest hyperscalers will reach 44% of sales by 2027, decisively exceeding the 32% peak recorded during the dot com bubble. The spending surge carries significant financial risks, including a projected $680 billion in cumulative depreciat...

Create a landscape editorial hero image for this Studio Global article: According to Morgan Stanley's recent report, how does current AI-related capital expenditure intensity among the largest hyperscalers (Amazo. Article summary: ## Key Findings from Morgan Stanley's Recent AI Capex Analysis. Topic tags: general, general web, user generated, news. Reference image context from search candidates: Reference image 1: visual subject "This chart shows the annual capital expenditure of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft." source context "Chart: Big Tech's AI Spending to Reach $725 Billion in 2026 | Statista" Reference image 2: visual subject "This chart shows the annual capital expenditure of Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Microsoft." source context "Chart: Big Tech's AI Spending to Reach $725 Billion in 2026 | Statista" Style: premium digital editorial illustration, source-backed research mood,
The AI infrastructure buildout has entered unprecedented territory. Morgan Stanley’s latest research reveals that the capital expenditure intensity of the five largest hyperscalers—Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, and Oracle—has not just approached but decisively surpassed the peak levels seen during the dot-com bubble. The numbers are staggering, the revisions relentless, and the financial implications extend far beyond the technology sector itself.
Morgan Stanley’s Global Valuation, Accounting & Tax strategists now forecast that the cash capex-to-sales ratio for the five hyperscalers will reach 36% in 2026, 44% in 2027, and 42% in 2028 . The 44% figure for 2027 is well above the approximately 32% peak recorded during the dot-com era
. When finance leases are factored in, these ratios are pushed even higher
.
This is a dramatic escalation from earlier estimates. In September 2025, Morgan Stanley had projected a 26% capex-to-revenue ratio by 2027—a level that merely approached the dot-com peak . The upward revision underscores how rapidly the AI spending race has intensified.
For context, the current intensity also surpasses the 20% ratio seen during the shale oil boom . Morgan Stanley’s analysis notes that just a handful of U.S. tech companies are now set to spend almost as much on capital equipment as the entire U.S. economy
.
The trajectory of Morgan Stanley’s capex forecasts tells its own story. A year ago, the bank projected combined hyperscaler capex at roughly $450 billion for both 2026 and 2027 . Those estimates have now more than doubled:
The 2027 figure is more than four times what the group spent in 2024 . After rising 70% year-over-year in 2025, hyperscaler capex is poised to continue accelerating, with an incremental $2 trillion expected through 2028
. Morgan Stanley’s equity analysts led by Brian Nowak now model these dramatically higher figures following first-quarter earnings reports
.
The enormous capital outlays are creating a looming depreciation problem. Morgan Stanley provides two overlapping estimates:
The company-level projections are particularly striking. Alphabet’s depreciation expenses could increase fourfold by the end of 2028 . Oracle’s depreciation charge of roughly $4 billion in 2025 might balloon to as much as $56 billion by 2029, which would equate to approximately 28% of consensus revenue estimates
.
These charges matter because they flow directly through the income statement, compressing margins and reducing reported earnings. The Financial Times has characterized this as Big Tech’s “buy-now-book-later problem” .
Among the five hyperscalers, Oracle is most exposed. Its depreciation-to-revenue ratio is projected to rise from approximately 7% to 28% over the coming years . Because Oracle’s revenue base is smaller than its peers, the same dollar amount of infrastructure depreciation claims a much larger share of its top line. Morgan Stanley analysts have flagged Oracle as the company where the mismatch between heavy AI infrastructure spending and revenues will be most visible in financial statements
.
The reported capex figures may understate the true financial exposure. Morgan Stanley notes that finance leases are pushing effective capex-to-sales ratios even higher than cash capex figures suggest . More significantly, technology companies have moved more than $120 billion in data center spending off their balance sheets through special-purpose vehicles (SPVs) and similar structures in under two years, creating hidden leverage and litigation risk
.
Moody’s Ratings has separately flagged that the top five U.S. hyperscalers have accumulated $662 billion in future data center lease commitments that have not yet commenced and therefore sit entirely off their balance sheets under current accounting rules . This off-balance-sheet financing has drawn scrutiny from U.S. senators, who have specifically called out structures where external investors fund and own data centers that are then leased back to the technology companies
.
The hyperscalers cannot fund this buildout from operating cash flow alone. Morgan Stanley estimates that roughly $2.9 trillion in global data center capex will be required through 2028, with a $1.5 trillion financing gap that must be filled by external capital . The projected split:
Debt issuance is already surging. Hyperscalers issued more than $100 billion of investment-grade debt in 2025 alone to finance data center buildouts . Morgan Stanley expects net debt supply from this cohort to increase by roughly 30% to 50% in 2026, potentially reaching $130 billion to $150 billion
. Reuters reported that annual debt issuance tied to AI and data centers rose from $166 billion in 2023 to $625 billion in 2025
. J.P. Morgan has estimated total new debt from Big Tech at $455 billion across 27 issuers, including $357 billion in direct borrowing by the five hyperscalers
.
Morgan Stanley has drawn several sobering historical comparisons:
Morgan Stanley Wealth Management’s chief investment officer Lisa Shalett has warned of “cracks” forming in the AI capex boom, calling the sustainability of GenAI investment the most important question for investors in the coming year. She noted: “When it comes to market-discounting scenarios, we believe we are closer to the seventh than the first” .
The broader research context underscores the scale: Morgan Stanley estimates that nearly $3 trillion of AI-related infrastructure investment will flow through the global economy by 2028, with more than 80% of that spending still ahead . The bank characterizes the buildout as more akin to an industrial build-out than speculative tech spending, but the financial engineering, depreciation burden, and debt dependency introduce risks that echo previous boom-and-bust cycles in uncomfortable ways.
Studio Global AI
Use this topic as a starting point for a fresh source-backed answer, then compare citations before you share it.
Morgan Stanley now projects that AI related capital expenditure among the five largest hyperscalers will reach 44% of sales by 2027, decisively exceeding the 32% peak recorded during the dot com bubble.
Morgan Stanley now projects that AI related capital expenditure among the five largest hyperscalers will reach 44% of sales by 2027, decisively exceeding the 32% peak recorded during the dot com bubble. The spending surge carries significant financial risks, including a projected $680 billion in cumulative depreciation charges for Microsoft, Oracle, Meta, and Alphabet over the next four years.
Morgan Stanley identifies a $1.5 trillion funding gap through 2028 that will need to be filled by credit markets, even as over $120 billion in data center spending has already been moved off balance sheets through spe...