If the winner cannot host, the EBU will approach the runner-up or another participating broadcaster to stage the event instead. If no host can be found from the previous year's finalists, the EBU may open bidding to any member broadcaster .
Crucially, the rule applies only to hosting rights. Countries in armed conflict may still compete in the contest — they simply cannot host if they win .
Israel's ongoing military campaign in Gaza means that under the new rules Israel would be ineligible to host Eurovision if it won . Swedish broadcaster SVT explicitly stated that "neither Israel nor Ukraine could host in the current situation"
.
The EBU did not name any country explicitly, but multiple major outlets — including the NYT, BBC, DW, Al Jazeera, and Time — reported that the rule change was widely seen as a direct response to the controversy surrounding Israel's continued participation .
The rule change does not affect Israel's right to participate in future contests. That remains a separate decision by the EBU's governing bodies.
In May 2026, five countries — Ireland, Spain, the Netherlands, Slovenia, and Iceland — boycotted the 2026 contest over Israel's inclusion, refusing to broadcast or participate . Spain withdrew for the first time in its history
.
The hosting eligibility rule change was approved following "feedback from participating broadcasters" after that boycott, making it a direct institutional response to the political crisis the boycott exposed .
The EBU also approved several other changes. The minimum age for competing artists rises from 16 to 18, effective 2027, to better protect young performers from competition pressures .
If a winning country cannot host due to the security clause, the EBU now has a clear procedure for selecting an alternative host among participating broadcasters .
Additional rule updates reportedly introduce stricter live vocal requirements and potential voting process changes, though these were less prominently covered in the main announcements .
The EBU has not publicly defined the precise threshold for what constitutes an "armed conflict" or "sensitive geopolitical situation." The discretion rests with the Reference Group on a case-by-case basis, which leaves room for future controversy over how the rules are applied — including whether they could be applied unevenly .