", particularly as the details of the reported situation were not made public." is it? please research and confirm

I’d soften that line. Based on the provided sources, there was media reporting on internal frictions involving MoneyHero and its board chairman, but I can’t fully confirm from the snippets alone that “the details were not made public.”

What we can safely say:

• There was public media reporting under the headline “MoneyHero probes board chairman as internal frictions rise.”
• MoneyHero’s official leadership transition announcement states that Danny Leung was appointed Interim CEO, succeeding Rohith Murthy.
• The provided official announcement materials do not reference internal struggle or governance conflict as the reason for the CEO change.
• Because the official announcement does not link the CEO change to the media-reported internal matters, it would be safer not to say “the details were not made public” unless you have reviewed the full article and confirmed that.

Suggested revised wording:

“Taken together, this creates a narrative that may place too much emphasis on media-reported internal governance matters, which were not referenced in the Company’s official leadership transition announcement.”

This is safer and more defensible.